Proportional Assist Ventilation [PAV+]

Proportional assist ventilation has been around in various shapes and forms since the late 1990s. The most advanced current iteration – PAV+ – is unique to Puritan Bennett ventilators. It is a closed loop mode of ventilation. That means that the ventilator dynamically changes the level of assistance that the patient receives in response to patient effort.
PAV+ is neither volume controlled nor pressure controlled but is patient (and operator) controlled. The operator adjusts the percentage support that the ventilator delivers to the patient. The patient breathes – triggering the ventilator – and the ventilator amplifies the patient’s breath. Consequently the more work that the patient does to generate muscular effort the more work the ventilator performs to match the patient’s workload.

It has been known for some time that the diaphragm becomes both atrophic and dysfunctional in acute critical illness, in particular due to disuse during control of mechanical ventilation. In most assisted modes, all the patient needs to do is trigger the ventilator. Patient workload may be inversely proportional to ventilator workload. Frequently the patient’s diaphragm and ventilator are out of synchrony.

PAV+ is patient triggered and flow cycled so it should be seen as a form of pressure support ventilation. PAV+ contrasts with standard pressure support in that the degree of support changes from breath to breath and indeed within breath depending on patient effort. Pressure support delivers a fixed airway pressure for every single breath irrespective of patient effort. Consequently if we map patient effort to ventilator workload there is only one point where the two will intersect. Conversely in proportional assist ventilation the workload of the ventilator and the workload of the patient increase and decrease linearly.

PAV+ works by utilizing very high quality flow and pressure sensors. The ventilator determines when the patient initiates the breath and when the breath is completed. Having instructed the ventilator what proportion of work of breathing that the ventilator should perform, one observes, using a work of breathing bar, if the patient is doing satisfactory work or whether they need to increase or decrease their workload. The work of breathing (WOB) is determined by the ventilator by measuring compliance, resistance and intrinsic peep dynamically every 9 to 12 breaths. As such a Green Zone between 0.3 and 0.7 joules per litre is indicative of ideal work of breathing for the patient; I call this the “sweet spot.” As long as the patient’s WOB resides within the sweet spot of the toolbar the bedside clinician can be satisfied that the patient is both comfortable and safe.

As the tidal volume relates to the patient’s neural activity that results in diaphragmatic power one should not be unduly concerned about high or low tidal volumes in this mode.

If one wishes to put a patient on proportional assist ventilation it is imperative that one determines if the patient is breathing spontaneously and taking an adequate minute ventilation prior to using this mode. The reason for this is that there is no backup rate in PAV+. Usually one starts with 70% support: that means 70% of the work of breathing is performed by the ventilator on 30% by the patient. After a couple of minutes, once one has observed the work of breathing bar, one can make adjustments either to increase the workload of the ventilator or to reduce it by keeping the patient within that Green Zone sweet spot. Generally failure of the patient to settle on this mode is manifest by a respiratory rate of more than 35. Once the patient has been on 20% support for an hour or more and is awake, obeying commands, protecting their airway, and not being suctioned frequently then the patient can be extubated.

Studies that have looked at PAV+ versus pressure support have indicated that weaning is more rapid with PAV+.

Hypernatremia

This tutorial looks at hypernatremia and hyperosmolar syndrome. Hypernatremia is usually caused by three things: 1) Profound dehydration, 2) Too much sodium intake – most of the time this is due to over-resuscitation with isotonic fluids, 3) Central or Nephrogenic Diabetes Insipidis. I explain how to calculate water deficit and water replacement and how to evaluate and treat patients with diabetes insipidus. @ccmtutorials

Osmotic Demyelination Syndrome / Central Pontine Myelinolysis – final thoughts

I often wonder if the obsession amongst physicians regarding the prevention of Osmotic Demyelination Syndrome (ODS or Central Pontine Myelinolysis – CPM) results in adverse patient outcomes – for example a greater incidence of iatrogenic complications, prolonged length of stay etc.

In this discussion, I look at the history of ODS/CPM, how it became identified with rapid correction of hyponatremia and what patients are at particular risk of this disorder. In the second part of the discussion I address the re-ignited controversy about Sodium/Osmolality correction subsequent to the publication of a major study in NEJM Evidence in 2023.

Ultimately each clinician must make up their own minds on the evidence that is available. It appears to me that there is little or no risk of ODS/CPM in patients with acute hyponatremia, symptomatic or not, and those with a plasma sodium of greater than 120mmol/L. Patients with Sodium levels below 105mmol/L, alcoholics or cirrhotics and malnourished patient appear to be at very high risk. Finally attention should be paid not only to the speed of correction, but where the plasma sodium levels ends up. In many studies – ODS/CMP is a late diagnosis and patients, at the time of diagnosis are hypernatremic (greater than 145mmol/l) – although the rise in Sodium/Osmolality may appear slow over days or weeks.

Urinary Osmolality, Elderly Patients, Alcoholics and Hyponatremia

This discussion came about following a discussion with my colleague, Dr Bairbre McNicholas. It focuses principally on the problem of hyponatremia in elderly patients and undernourished alcoholics. I explain why the lack of dietary salt and protein intake massively inhibits water excretion resulting in hypotonic hyponatremia, often with fluid overload. The traditional approach to managing hyponatremia – fluid restriction – frequently fails because it is a problem of solute “underload” rather than water overload. Commencing iv fluids may precipitate a rapid and potentially dangerous diuresis – hence the most effective therapy for these patients is the FEED them.

I guarantee you’ll learn something.

Metabolic Acidosis – What it is, Diagnosis and Tools

This is Tutorial 4 in the Acid Base Series – on the topic of Metabolic Acidosis. The tutorial is based on a single blood gas – a random sample that was handed to me in the ICU recently. Blood Gas Used in This Tutorial: pH 7.19 PaCO2 32mmHg (4.1kPa) HCO3- 13.1 BE – 16.5 AG 20 Na+ 126 K+ 3.1 Cl- 96 Lactate- 7.2 Ketones- 0.6mmol/L Albumin 21g/L Creatinine 3.3mg/dl (293mmol/l)

Metabolic Acidosis is characterized by an increase in the relative ratio of strong anions to strong cations in the plasma. The PaCO2 and the Bicarbonate fall in a predictable manner. It is possible to compute the effectiveness of respiratory compensation for metabolic acidosis by using the Winters equation.

To understand the mechanism of metabolic acidosis – caused by accumulation of mineral (Chloride) and organic (Lactate, Ketones, Metabolic Junk Products) anions – one needs to apply the law of Electrical Neutrality. All of the positive charges must equal all of the negative charges. As Bicarbonate is consumed in the process of buffering metabolic acidosis, the change in the Bicarbonate level (downwards) can be used to quantify the degree of acidosis. This is important because the pH may be within the normal range due to respiratory compensation. Be aware that the HCO3- quantum that is displayed on a blood gas is derived from the pH and PCO2 by the Henderson Hasselbalch equation.

Unfortunately, because respiratory abnormalities may complicate the diagnosis of metabolic acidosis, and pH and PCO2 are altered by changes in temperature, the precision of a single reading of PCO2 and HCO3- may be poor. Consequently, the Standard Base Excess was developed to excise the respiratory component from the change in bicarbonate. Again it is a derived variable and may be imprecise. Nevertheless, BE (or 1-BE the Base Deficit BD) is a terrific scanning tool to identify the presence of a metabolic acidosis (BD) or alkalosis (BE). It is defined as the amount of strong cation (BD) or strong anion (BE) required to bring the pH back to 7.4 when the temperature is 37 degrees Celcius and the the PaCO2 is 40mmHg or 5.3kPa.

The Base Deficit does not indicate the source of the acidosis, but it can be recalculated to remove the impact of the [Na+], the [Cl-], the body water and the serum Albumin (and the Lactate) to determine the Base Deficit Gap – indicative of the quantity of Unmeasured Anions (UMA, Ketones, if not measured, and Renal Acids (metabolic junk products – MJP).

Traditionally clinicians use the Anion Gap to determine whether a patient has a Hyperchloremic Acidosis (no gap) from a UMA acidosis. I find this quite a dated concept. If the [Cl-] exceeds 105 and the plasma Sodium is normal, the patient has a Hypercloremic acidosis. We can easily measure Ketones and Lactate. The AG is imprecise and should be adjusted for the Albumin level, which tends to hover around 25g per liter in critically ill patients (narrowing the Gap and alkalinizing the patient). I do think if you are calculating the AG that you must include the K+ on the Cation side, the Lactate on the Anion side and adjust the Albumin.

The Strong Ion Gap is a more advanced, more precise and more cumbersome version of the AG. Regardless of the approach, one eventually ends up with a quantify of unidentifiable anions (SIG) that may be of medley origin (metabolism, poisoning etc). It is my opinion that it is useful to tease out all of the different acidifying and alkalinizing processes (the Fencl approach) to determine what is going on with the patient. All of these calculations can be done in seconds with smartphone apps and spreadsheets.

I guarantee you will learn something. @ccmtutorials http://www.ccm-tutorials.com

Why isn’t the patient breathing up? (Triggering the Ventilator)

Is there anything more frustrating in the ICU when you decide to start weaning a patient – they look like they’re assisting the ventilator. You switch them over to a “spontaneous” mode and then……nothing…..no breaths….eventually the backup starts.

This tutorial is about triggering of mechanical ventilation. I will revisit how patients trigger the ventilator, the different systems used and introduce I-Sync – a new method of triggering.

Finally I will discuss the problem of Auto-PEEP and explain why, in the setting of Auto-PEEP, there is no point fiddling with the flow by or negative pressure.

I guarantee you will learn something. @ccmtutorials www.ccmtutorials.org

The Wibbly Wobbly Waveform – Expiratory Dysynchrony

Expiratory dysynchrony is a major unrecognized problem in critical care. Usually it takes one of two forms: a terminal upstroke on the pressure waveform, indicating pressure cycling (breath too long) or a W shaped anomaly in the expiratory flow waveform – indicative of the breath being too short or too long. I call this the “Wibbly Wobbly Waveform”.

This tutorial looks at expiratory dysynchrony – why it happens and how to make adjustments to resolve the problem. I also introduce a relatively new technology: IE Sync.

Help- The Patient’s Airway Pressures are STILL HIGH!

In the previous tutorial we looked at the problem of high airway pressures and addressed inspiratory airway resistance in two ways: peak to plateau pressure gradient and dynamic and static inspiratory resistance.

In this tutorial we will look at three more ways of assessing airflow resistance: the identification and measurement of Auto-PEEP, Flow-Volume Loops and capnography.

Subsequently I discuss high airway pressure due to low total respiratory system compliance. I explain that when “compliance” is low – this may be a problem with the lungs as well as the chest wall – including the abdomen. I finish with the introduction into this course of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome.

50 Tutorials Uploaded! Now – Help the Patient’s Airway Pressures Are High!

The alarm goes off like an air raid siren – everybody starts to panic – somebody starts to do the saturation countdown. There is nothing quite as distressing for the anesthesiologist or intensivist than for the ventilator to pressure cycle and fail to deliver tidal volumes due to high airway pressure.

Generally high pressures are caused by one of three things – a problem with the equipment (kinked tubing, patient biting the tubing etc.), an airway resistance problem (e.g. bronchospasm) or a pulmonary compliance problem (e.g. consolidation or pulmonary edema) or a combination of these. The first thing that the clinician should do when there pressure alarm goes off – is to silence the alarm and increase the Pmax.

Then go looking for the problem: start at the mouth and work your way back to the machine. If you can’t find a fault, put the patient on a manual breathing circuit and commence ventilation. If the patient is easy to bag, there is a machine problem, if difficult – then there is a problem with pulmonary resistance or compliance. In this first tutorial I look at assessing airway resistance. I do this in two ways. First I discuss peak to plateau pressure gradients and then look at airway resistance: dynamic versus static and how to calculate it. I will finish the discussion in the next tutorial.

Volume Pressure Loops – they are on every ventilator and anesthetic machine – look at them

This tutorial looks at the pressure waveform in patients undergoing anesthesia or mechanically ventilated in ICU. All modern ventilators will provide a pressure time waveform and display volume pressure (often called “pressure volume” loops).

This tutorial commences with a discussion about pressure-flow loops – to demonstrate the relationship between flow and airway pressure. I then discuss and describe normal airway pressure versus time waveforms.

Subsequently I explore normal and abnormal dynamic volume pressure loops. I briefly discuss static VP-curves and why they are important in ARDS. Finally I demonstrate how you can measure real plateau pressure and static compliance by pushing one button and performing an inspiratory hold.

@ccmtutorials http://www.ccmtutorials.org